The British government,
accused of abusing media freedom, said on Tuesday police were right to detain a journalist’s partner if they thought lives might be at risk
from data he was carrying from fugitive U.S. intelligence contractor Edward Snowden. Facing legal and diplomatic complaints after
police held Guardian writer Glenn Greenwald’s Brazilian partner for nine hours on Sunday – and accused by the newspaper of forcing it to trash
computers holding copies of Snowden’s data – the interior minister said officers were entitled to take security measures.
Home Secretary Theresa May said police held David Miranda at a London airport under anti-terrorism powers, which allow for action to prevent stolen data to aid terrorists. Material
from Snowden, published by the Guardian, has revealed extensive U.S. and British surveillance of global communications networks.
“It’s absolutely right that if the police believe that somebody is in possession of highly sensitive, stolen information that could help
terrorists, that could risk lives, lead to a potential loss of life, the police are able to act -and that’s what the law enables them to do,”May told the BBC.
She added, however, that an independent reviewer was looking into the police conduct.
As interior minister, May said she was briefed in advance that Miranda might be stopped but added that she did not decide who the police detained. The United States said Britain gave it
a “heads up” but it did not ask for Miranda to be questioned.
Snowden, who faces criminal charges in the United States, has been granted a year’s asylum by Russia.
A British lawyer who launched an action on Miranda’s behalf to question the legal basis of his detention said police seized a laptop computer, a telephone, memory sticks, a
computer hard drive and a games console from him. He was released without charge after reaching a time limit on such detentions.
Miranda had been in transit at Heathrow airport, carrying material from Snowden that was being
passed from Berlin-based American documentary filmmaker Laura Poitras to Greenwald, an American writer for Britain’s Guardian who lives
in Rio de Janeiro.
“These items contain sensitive, confidential journalistic material and should not have been seized,” Miranda’s London lawyers wrote in a
letter to May and the police.
In an interview with CNN along with Greenwald,
Miranda said the officers who questioned him
told him he could be jailed if he did not answer
everything they asked. Even though he was
detained under an anti-terrorism law, he said:
“No, they didn’t ask me anything about terrorism
– not one question about it.”
Brazil’s government has complained to Britain.
The action against Miranda also was denounced
by British opposition politicians, human rights
lawyers and press freedom groups.
The leaks by Snowden, a former U.S. National Security Agency (NSA) contractor, disclosed
details of NSA and British surveillance of public telephone and internet traffic.
The United States
and Britain say their agencies acted within their
laws and the leaks threatened their national security.
‘YOU’VE HAD YOUR FUN’
On Tuesday, Guardian editors revealed how and why the newspaper destroyed computer hard drives containing copies of some of the secret files leaked by Snowden.
A timeline of events provided by the Guardian said initial British attempts to stop reporting on
the files came two weeks after the newspaper published its first three stories based on Snowden’s leaks.
These stories were about a secret U.S. court order obliging communications company Verizon to hand over data on customers’ phone usage,
Britain’s secretive Government Communications Headquarters’ (GCHQ) use of data from an NSA
internet monitoring program, and British intelligence spying on allies in London.
Shortly afterward, two senior British officials arrived to see editor Alan Rusbridger to demand
the newspaper hand over all its Snowden files, arguing the material was stolen, according to the
Guardian’s timeline. He refused.
Three weeks later, in July, after the publication of more articles, officials got back in touch with
Rusbridger and told him, according to the newspaper: “You’ve had your fun. Now we want the stuff back.”
The officials expressed fears that foreign governments, particularly Russia or China, could
hack into the newspaper’s IT network although the journalists stressed the documents were not
stored on any Guardian system but held in isolation, according to the newspaper.
Between July 16 and 19, the Guardian said government pressure intensified and there was an explicit threat of legal action if the newspaper did not comply.
Rusbridger said he decided if the government was determined to stop Britain-based reporting
on the Snowden files, the best option was to destroy the London copy and to edit and report from the same material held in the United
States and Brazil.
On July 20, two “security experts” from GCHQ visited the paper’s London head office and
watched as deputy editor Paul Johnson, executive director Sheila Fitzsimons and a newspaper computer expert used angle grinders
and other tools to pulverize hard drives and memory chips storing encrypted files, according
to the newspaper. Both sides knew other copies existed outside the Britain.
“I hope what (the Miranda detention
controversy) will do is to send people back to read the stories that so upset the British state because there has been a lot of reporting about
what GCHQ and the NSA are up to,” Rusbridger said.
In Washington, White House spokesman John Earnest said he could not comment on the destruction of some of the Guardian’s Snowden
material. But he said he could not see U.S. authorities destroying an American media company’s hard drives to protect national
“That’s very difficult to imagine a scenario in which that would be appropriate,” Earnest told
Greenwald told CNN he felt emboldened by Britain’s actions.
“It’s not going to stop our reporting. It doesn’t do them any good. All it did … is give them a huge black eye in the world, make them look thuggish and authoritarian, interfering in the
journalism process” while creating an
international incident with the government of Brazil, Greenwald added.
“Journalism is not a crime and it is not
terrorism,” he said. He also criticized the United States for having received a “heads up” about
Miranda being questioned but doing nothing to discourage it or protect the rights of a free press.
(Additional reporting by Andrew Wambi and
Belinda Goldsmith in Uganda, Mark Hosenball
and Ayesha Rascoe in Washington; Editing by